Zoya Alexandrovna Krakhmalnikova was maybe a confessor of the Faith. Indeed, it’s hard to find a confessor who calls for the Church to apologize — that is akin to asking the Holy Spirit to repent — and it’s even harder to find a confessor who failed to understand the difference between the Church and Her hierarchies pro-tempore. Maybe she was just a confessor of her pride, as the Saker is. Maybe the Saker is something worse.
The daughter of Zoya Alexandrovna is an apostate for sure.
May the Lord forgive me if I sin, but shouldn’t a bishop find something better to do than conceding interviews to apostates working for CIA’s outfits, that is working for the chief hitmen of the satanists ruling this world?
About the content of the interview, I wish to humbly suggest that our hierarchs would just pray (and a lot) for Metropolitan Sergius, instead of justifying him, glorifying him or erecting statues to him. Perhaps, in this way they would be able the next time they face the inquisition of an apostate to avoid begging pardon for liberal sins, appealing to secular laws and sensibilities.
Perhaps, in this way they would be able to call things by their name: namely, that the daughter of Zoya Alexandrovna is an apostate, just like that Kuraev, and they both serve the beast; that the Church opposes the filthiness produced by their kind just because She cannot but stand by the truth, regardless of secular laws; that if our standing by the Truth offends or disturbs them, it’s their problem not ours.
We have the solution for their problem though, the cure for their illness, if they are willing to be healed, if they turn so that the Lord must heal them.
The sublime virtue of prudence is not found in appeasing the devil. The devil cannot be at peace, neither his servants.
One thing for sure, though: the Soviet patriarchate has been one continuous lie, the lie of Metropolitan Sergius was just its beginning. Yet, one thing is even more certain: the Lord will judge him, not us. We judge only the fruits he brought forth.