Archive for May, 2018

THE CHILDREN AND THE DEVIL

May 31, 2018

A good article by father Sergius Chetverikov, which alas will fail to convince the pathetic warriors of fake freedoms and rights.

Unfortunately, having the post-Christian man totally reneged the Logos, he is damned to boast of an appalling stupidity. He is therefore too stupid to understand that by not “imposing religious values” to his children, he is ipso facto imposing anyway something upon them.

If you do not educate your children according to religious values, you are educating them anyway, but according to non-religious values. Only, as you are stupid or a liar, you are fond to masquerade that imposition under the name of their freedom.

It is the same hoax that will be then taken over and amplified by the public schools system, where your children will have the liberty to be teached mountains of crap, like the evolution and cosmic fables, an unilateral version of history, the love for the abomination and the refusal to discriminate between good and evil, together with the vision of the world as a competitive arena, and the attitude to be fiercely intolerant toward anything not sanctioned by the masters of the public discourse.

The only freedom you have in demonocracy is the freedom to listen to what they say and to do what they want. Enjoy!

Advertisements

ST. BOSILJKA THE MARTYR OF PASJANE

May 28, 2018

A Pure Gem of Kosovo and Metohija

St. Bosiljka Rajičić. Photo: svetigora.com

LA REPUBBLICA MATTARELLATA

May 28, 2018

L’Italia e’ una repubblica democratica, fondata sulla menzogna.

Il potere appartiene al popolo, che lo esercita nelle forme e nei limiti stabiliti da badanti al servizio dello straniero.

Risultati immagini per mattarella

L’individuo sopra raffigurato ha appena sputato in faccia a diciassette milioni e passa di cittadini italiani, vietando alle forze politiche da loro espresse nell’ultima consultazione elettorale, maggioranza assoluta dei votanti, di formare il governo, sulla base di poteri che costituzionalmente non possiede.

A meno che l’individuo sopra raffigurato non indichi quale norma di legge proibisce ad un cittadino italiano di diventare ministro sulla base di semplici critiche espresse nei confronti dell’euro e dell’Unione Europea, egli ha impedito la formazione di un governo sulla base di valutazioni politiche, ambito nel quale la Costituzione italiana non gli consente di mettere becco, garantendone l’irresponsabilita’ politica.

E’ necessario altresi’ aggiungere che perfino nel caso la Costituzione gli consentisse tali valutazioni politiche, E NON GLIELE CONSENTE, il suo operato sarebbe illegittimo in quanto sia l’uscita dall’euro che l’abbandono dell’Unione Europea non rientravano nel programma del governo di cui egli ha vietato la formazione.

Pertanto, se l’individuo sopra raffigurato non venisse immediatamente messo sotto accusa e processato per ATTENTATO ALLA COSTITUZIONE, lo Stato italiano perderebbe qualsiasi legittimita’, sia pur putativa, ancora avesse. In quanto alla credibilita’, lo Stato italiano non ne ha mai avuto.

In verita’, lo Stato italiano non e’ mai stato una cosa seria. Pero’ non si era mai visto nelle sue funzioni istituzionali il dominio incontrastato di nani, puttane e ballerine, con la totale scomparsa perfino delle parvenze di onesta’ e decenza, come e’ stato negli ultimi sette anni.

Dopo il caso portoghese di tre anni fa, in Europa solo degli idioti potevano ancora credere in quella mitica bestia chiamata democrazia. Oggi, dopo le scoregge greche ed il colpo di Stato appena ufficializzato in Italia, pure gli idioti non hanno piu’ scuse!

******* P O S T     S C R I P T U M  *******

Le forze politiche vittoriose nell’ultima consultazione elettorale hanno ceduto: sta per nascere il loro governo, senza Paolo Savona al ministero di Economia e Finanza, come da veto imposto in spregio alla Costituzione dal Re Sole de’noartri.

La domanda nasce spontanea: per quale caspita di motivo non hanno ceduto domenica scorsa?

Non aspettatevi risposte.

Come che sia, questo governo e’ nato, autodefinendosi il governo del cambiamento. Vedremo abbastanza presto se, invece, essi non siano altro che scoregge italiche.

Lo vedremo dalla implementazione o meno in tempi brevi di una riforma fiscale epocale per l’Italia: lo Stato che finalmente paga i suoi debiti fiscali ai cittadini ed alle imprese (70-80 miliardi di euro al momento), sotto forma di buoni del Tesoro messi direttamente nelle loro tasche, e quindi in immediata circolazione economica.

Una pensata geniale, che va nella direzione giusta, la cui rinuncia renderebbe ipso facto ed incontestabilmente il cambiamento strombazzato la solita esalazione mefitica ed i signori del governo gli usuali petomani, che prestano il nome ai padroni occulti che hanno espugnato gli Stati nazionali quasi dappertutto.

La soluzione proposta non e’ proprio l’ideale, almeno sotto il profilo teoretico, in quanto non rispetta in pieno i postulati fondamentali dell’emissione monetaria sovrana, ma in pratica non manchera’ di assicurare l’unica cosa che conta: la sopravvivenza del popolo italiano. Il suo pregio fondamentale, cosa che probabilmente sorprendera’ gli ideatori stessi della proposta, sta nel fatto che non sostituisce l’euro ma lo affianca nella circolazione nel sistema economico.

Contrariamente a quanto sostenuto da molti, infatti, il ritorno alla lira non significherebbe affatto la riappropriazione della sovranita’ monetaria da parte dello Stato italiano, ma solo il rimetterla nuovamente alla Banca d’Italia; e fino a quando la Banca d’Italia non viene nazionalizzata e messa DIRETTAMENTE alle dipendenze del Tesoro, il ritorno alla lira costituirebbe semplicemente un cambiamento al nome del cappio messo intorno al collo del popolo italiano.

Altra cosa che molti proprio non riescono a capire e’ il fatto che la svalutazione della propria valuta puo’ essere una gran cosa per le aziende esportatrici, ed e’ sostanzialmente neutra per l’ambito economico interno, ma rappresenta un disastro per la bilancia commerciale del Paese ed il suo potere d’acquisto internazionale, cosa che dovrebbe far riflettere statisti che devono governare una nazione che dipende quasi interamente per il suo fabbisogno energetico da acquisti sui mercati internazionali. Una riflessione che dovrebbe far concludere per l’estrema convenienza della nostra permanenza nel sistema monetario europeo, con graduale sostituzione della valuta europea con i buoni del nostro Tesoro per quanto riguarda la circolazione interna, almeno relativamente al fabbisogno statale per il suo funzionamento, per lo sviluppo economico ed infrastrutturale, e l’assistenza a chi ne ha bisogno. In tal modo, le necessita’ per lo Stato di rifinanziarsi in euro verrebbero drasticamente abbattute, fino ad essere ricondotte in un alveo di assoluta sostenibilita’, e con un aumento enorme della domanda per sue emissioni debitorie in euro.

Ho gia’ argomentato profusamente al riguardo, e li’ rimando per ogni dettaglio.

In effetti, spero che gli ideatori della proposta non pensino davvero di utilizzarla solo per il rimborso dei debiti fiscali dello Stato. Il governo deve coprire con i propri buoni del Tesoro tutto quello che e’ possibile coprire, e fregarsene di qualsiasi obiezione o minaccia venga dai nemici del Paese o dalla quinta colonna di venduti interna, poiche’ sta usando sovranita’ fiscale, non monetaria. La differenza tra le due e’ sottile, ma esiste, ed e’ in ogni caso enormemente piu’ rilevante della differenza tra monetizzazione del debito statale e quello che sta facendo adesso Draghi, che non sono la stessa cosa solo perche’ cosi’ dice Draghi.

Del resto, il discrimine tra scoregge italiche o statisti che passeranno alla storia per aver liberato il proprio Paese si trova proprio nel fatto di non aver alcun timore di finire ai materassi, nel caso si dovesse venire ad una resa dei conti. Tale resa dei conti non conviene a nessuno di lor signori.

Sotto il profilo della minaccia legale, i trattati dell’Unione Europea sono incostituzionali.

Sotto l’aspetto della minaccia economica e finanziaria, il debito pubblico italiano e’ un loro problema, non nostro.

Sotto l’aspetto della minaccia illegale ed eversivale contromisure possibili sono molteplici e, ovviamente, impubblicabili.

Detto questo, vi sono poi una serie di altri provvedimenti indispensabili ai fini di una effettiva liberazione del patrio suolo dal nemico. Elenchero’ solo i piu’ importanti.

1 – Espulsione immediata di ogni straniero che si trovi illegalmente in Italia. Vi sono quasi un milione di tali persone nel Paese e rappresentano probabilmente la piu’ immediata minaccia alla sua sicurezza nazionale; sicurezza nazionale intesa qui nel senso proprio del termine, e cioe’ sicurezza dei cittadini e delle istituzioni costituzionali, e non difesa di impunita’ e privilegi vari degli occupanti e dei loro ascari.

2 – Creazione su base regionale di banche a capitale pubblico con filiali in ogni singolo Comune, da statuto obbligate a finanziare ESCLUSIVAMENTE progetti infrastrutturali, famiglie e piccole/medie imprese dei territori di riferimento, le quali funzioneranno al tempo stesso da raccolta del risparmio privato, sottraendolo quindi alle banche oggi esistenti, che sono tutte in mani straniere; tale risparmio sara’ cosi’ finalmente tutelato ed incanalato verso il benessere dei cittadini e del territorio dove vivono.

3 – Attuazione del divieto costituzionale del trattamento sanitario obbligatorio. Per fare esempi pratici, questo si traduce nella abrogazione immediata di abomini come il cd. decreto Lorenzin e nel rimborso delle spese per i malati di tumore che vogliono curarsi con il Metodo Di Bellainvece che farsi avvelenare dalla chemio.

4 – Eliminazione dalla Costituzione del cd. fiscal compact.

5 – Tutte le ONG devono pubblicare permanentemente su ogni loro sito ed in ogni loro sede e pubblicazione ed articolo da chi sono finanziate, e va proibito loro ogni finanziamento proveniente da qualsiasi fonte governativa, anche indiretta, ed ogni finanziamento estero che non provenga da privati cittadini.

Tutte queste cose non sono previste nel contratto di governo, dove al massimo si parla di qualcuno di questi punti in maniera vaga e fumosa, ma sono essenziali se davvero si vuole il cd. cambiamento. Non so cosa intenda il nuovo governo con questa parola, ma l’unica accezione che le da’ senso oggi e’ liberazione.

Riusciranno i nostri eroi ……..? In verita’, io non lo credo. Per riuscire in qualcosa, bisogna volerlo, e non vedo proprio tale volonta’ nel complesso, nonostante questo governo sia espressione di forze politiche non colpevoli dello scempio commesso ai danni dei popoli italiani. Ma si sentano liberi di smentirmi CON I FATTI.

Del resto, fino a quando non verra’ messa fine alla strage, all’assassinio pluriaggravato (da vincoli di sangue e futili motivi) che nascondono sotto il nome di aborto, nella vana speranza che cambiando il nome di cio’ che fanno cambi anche la sostanza (ed il giudizio che li aspetta), non potra’ esservi vero riscatto per una nazione che si e’ consegnata nelle mani del diavolo, al quale sacrifica i suoi figli.

Il loro sangue innocente ha maledetto la terra.

Il diavolo ha davvero fatto un ottimo lavoro, tramite i suoi pupazzi, nel convincere la gente che egli non esiste. In realta’, qualunque governante abbia davvero a cuore il benessere materiale e spirituale del suo popolo, e voglia porvi mano senza credere che la sua sara’ innanzitutto una battaglia contro adoratori e servitori (sia pur inconsapevoli in molti) del diavolosi sbaglia di grosso. Puo’ tranquillamente smettere di agitarsi, tanto non otterra’ niente.

In verita’, il diavolo e’ nascosto in piena luce. Ma essendo questi i tempi della grande apostasia, la gente ha semplicemente smesso di prestare attenzione.

Alice Bailey said when you are changing a nation, don’t bother with the old people, they are too stuck in the old traditions, they will not change, but GO FOR THE CHILDREN….

1.TAKE GOD AND PRAYER OUT OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM

She said; Change curriculum to ensure that children are freed from the bondage of Christian culture. Why? Because children go to school to be equipped to face life, they are willing to trust and they are willing to value what is being given to them.
If you take God out of education, they will unconsciously form a resolve that God is not necessary to face life. They will focus on those things the school counts them worthy to be passed on and they will look at God as an additional, if one can afford the additional

2.REDUCE PARENTAL AUTHORITY OVER THE CHILDREN

She said; Break the communication between parent and child (Why?). So that parents do not pass on their Christian traditions to their children, liberate children from the bondage of their parent traditions (how?)

a)Promote excessive child rights;

b)Abolish corporal punishment

c)Teachers are the agents of implementation – from workshops, teachers tell children ‘your parent has no right to force you to pray or read the Bible, you are yourself, have a right of your own, you need to discover yourself, self expression, self realization, self fulfillment are all buzz words

3.DESTROY THE TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN FAMILY STRUCTURE (Why?).

The family is the core of the nation. If you break the family, you break the nation. Liberate the people from the confines of this structure (How?)

a)Promote sexual promiscuity – free young people to the concept of premarital sex, let them have free sex, lift it so high that the joy of enjoying it(sex) is the highest joy in life, fantasize it, that everybody will feel proud to be seen to be sexually active, even those outside of marriage

b)Use advertising industry, media – T.V., magazines, film industry to promote sexual enjoyment as the highest pleasure in humanity

4.IF SEX IS FREE, THEN MAKE ABORTION LEGAL AND MAKE IT EASY

She said; Build clinics for abortion – Health clinics in schools. If people are going to enjoy the joy of sexual relationships, they need to be free of unnecessary fears, in other words they should not be hampered with unwanted pregnancies.

5.MAKE DIVORCE EASY AND LEGAL, FREE PEOPLE FROM THE CONCEPT OF MARRIAGE FOR LIFE.

People enter into marriage having signed contracts of how they will share their things after divorce. People enter with one foot and another behind. 50 years ago divorce was unthinkable. It is one thing for a marriage to fail but it is another thing for people to enter marriage with an intention to enjoy as long as it was enjoyable and to walk out of it.

6. MAKE HOMOSEXUALITY AN ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE

Alice Bailey preached (50 yrs ago) that sexual enjoyment is the highest pleasure in humanity, no one must be denied and no one must be restricted how to enjoy themselves. People should be allowed in which ever way they chose they want, whether it is homosexuality or in incest or bestiality, as long as the two agree.

7. DEBASE ART, MAKE IT RUN MAD

How? Promote new forms of art which will corrupt and defile the imagination of people because art is the language of the spirit, that which is inside, you can bring out in painting, music, drama etc. Look at the quality of the music that is coming out, the films out of Holywood.

8. USE MEDIA TO PROMOTE AND CHANGE MINDSET

Alice Bailey said the greatest channel you need to use to change human attitude is media. Use the press, the radio, T.V, cinema. You can tell today how successful they have been in implementing the plan over 50 years via media as well as advertising agencies, billboards, magazines. Who controls media? (New Age); So much money is pumped into media and advertising spreading of pornographic material and other sources. Sex outside of marriage is thrown on your face 80-90 times than sex in marriage. Promiscuity is being promoted as natural, you watch gay sex on T.V. in homes where children’s minds are being neutralized to sensitivity to these things. You wonder why newspapers, T.V, etc do not record anything about Christian activities.

9. CREATE AN INTERFAITH MOVEMENT

Alice Bailey wrote; Promote other faiths to be at par with Christianity, and break this thing about Christianity as being the only way to heaven, by that Christianity will be pulled down and other faiths promoted. She said promote the importance of man in determining his own future and destiny – HUMANISM. She said tell man he has the right to choose what he wants to be and he can make it happen, he has the right to determine his cause – This takes God off His throne. We have seen in our nation, South Africa hosting a meeting of the Interfaith Movement in Cape Town led by Dalai Lama.

10. GET GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE ALL THESE LAW AND GET THE CHURCH TO ENDORSE THESE CHANGES.

Alice Bailey wrote that the church must change its doctrine and accommodate the people by accepting these things and put them into its structures and systems.

Risultati immagini per Orthodoxy and the Kingdom of Satan

Nota Bene – Nel caso tu non sappia chi sia Alice Bailey, e che le Nazioni Unite si fondano quasi direttamente sopra i suoi principi, sopra elencati, beh… e’ come ti dicevo: non stai prestando attenzione!

REDDITO DI CITTADINANZA

May 24, 2018

Una bella parola che, come quasi tutte le parole del mondo post-Cristiano, ha perso ogni significato che dovrebbe avere.

Tanto per cominciare, ma sarebbe il meno, e’ concesso ai residenti, non ai cittadini, e con requisiti molto selettivi. Ma il problema principale e’ che, come dimostra questo breve excursus nelle varie legislazioni statali dei Paesi che lo hanno adottato, a parte i casi di Danimarca, Finlandia e Irlanda (e magari Germania), esso e’ una vera e propria farsa.

Si tratta tutt’al piu’ di elemosina statale temporanea, concessa con disprezzo ed umiliazioni, come si conviene ad ogni Stato demonocratico che si rispetti. Tali spiccioli vengono inoltre concessi da persone che concedono a loro stesse stipendi fino a dieci volte superiori alla media per fare poco piu’ di un cazzo.

Non e’ lecito aspettarsi nulla di meglio se verra’ introdotto anche in Italia.

ALIVE

May 19, 2018

In memory of all the Latvian children who will be missing the celebration of the centenary of the Republic of Latvia because they were murdered by their mothers in their wombs, with the help of professional killers who gave oath to save lives, and the patronage of the government: their innocent blood is a curse upon the land.

In memory of the hundreds millions children assassinated in all of Europe in this modern sacrifice of infants to Baal (just one of the names of the devil), made first legal by a Lenin ukaz: their innocent blood has cursed the land.

“Once, being pregnant, I was lying on bed rest in an ordinary Russian maternity house,” said Elena Piskareva, telling the story of the creation of the film, “and there were some women lying in the beds next to me: some were on bed rest, fighting for their children’s lives, others came for an abortion and fighting for death, literally. And the irony is that the same doctors did the operation for those fighting for their lives, and for the others condemned to die. It was like a conveyor. Then I went home, my pregnancy having ended well, but this topic gave me no rest and I started to dig. I came across a network of dozens of sites with millions of emails of women who had had abortions, and a heap of women’s videos on YouTube. I saw such a huge array of pain that I realized: until I make this film, I will have no rest. Then I found out some figures that caused me to cringe: every year in Russia there are a million abortions (officially), and six million (unofficially, including commercial centers).”

The plot of the twenty minute film is rather simple. Eight women are waiting their turns to have abortions in the hospital ward. They’re all different ages, but they are united as one—they all have a very weighty, so they think, reason why they are there and have decided to take such a terrible step. One already has two kids and a mortgage, the second has a career and a life ahead of her, the third is preparing for graduation, and the fourth has nowhere to live in Moscow, working as a courier—how could she have a kid?… In casual conversation, one after another leaves for the office and comes back… Already after… Every time, when the nurse brings the next of the eight women in a wheelchair and places her on the hospital bed, the others become ill at ease, and all the more obvious for them is that thought that they tried to hide from themselves: that what is happening before their eyes, what’s going to happen with them—is not normal, but a terrible, unnatural slaughter; it is something that cannot be changed or returned later…

GOD DOES NOT LISTEN TO SINNERS

May 16, 2018

Then again called they the man that was blind, and said unto him, Give God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner. He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see.

Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes? He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his disciples?

Then they reviled him, and said, Thou art his disciple; but we are Moses’ disciples. We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is.

The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.

Yes you are right, formerly blind man, right a thousand times over that “God does not listen to sinners” (Jn. 9:31)! He does not listen and does not obey those unrepentant obstinate ones who do not wish to bow their heads before Him, and try to incline God Himself to fulfill their requests. A wise parent does not cave in to the manipulations of a spoiled child, no matter how sweetly he sings. Much less so the Giver of wisdom, our Father.

God does not listen to sinners also because they are directing their requests, apparently, not entirely to Him. Or entirely not to Him. Their god is their belly (Phil. 3:19), or mammon, or something else. This “something” occupies the central place in their lives. They made an idol their god, and as a result, the true God is for them something like an idol, useful only for providing them a set of religious services should they need them: help in becoming healthy, success in business, help in casting a spell, and so on. Why should God heed those requests that are directed essentially not to Him but to a mythical being of an incomparably lower order?

God does not hear sinners who insist that He hear them while they themselves shut up their own ears. So why should He listen to them if He can’t answer them, if that person is not waiting for an answer, if dialogue is simply not under consideration? Moreover that person doesn’t want an answer! A god who silently fulfills requests is much more convenient and practical.

God does not hear sinners also because their prayers are often vain and their requests selfish—not for the good, but in order to use it for their own lusts (cf. Js. 4:3). They ask for health not intending to use it for the glory of God. They ask for money without any thought of almsgiving. They ask for children without thinking about raising them in faith and piety.

God does not hear sinners, for they do not know what they want. Their desires are not far-seeing and if they come into being can cause harm. But at the time they do not know about this and continue to ask, ask, ask. Of course a normal father will not give his children a snake when they want a fish (cf. Lk. 11:11–13). But what if they insistently ask for a snake?

God does not listen to sinners. But this does not mean that He doesn’t hear them. He hears them; but will a doctor listen to a patient’s feverish delirium? No, He has no time for that! And no reason to do so—he has to cure him! Right away! When the fever has passed the speech will be healthy, and reasonableness will appear in it. Then he can listen, for The eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous, and His ears shall attend unto their supplications (Ps. 33:15). But until then, God does not listen to sinners, but He has not turned away from them—no, He has not turned away.

Again and again you are right, blind man, for God does not hear even sinners who are repenting! He does not pay heed to their timid “Father, I have sinned against heaven…” He does not ask any questions but embraces them, kisses them, dresses them in clean garments, takes them into His house and has a feast (cf. Lk. 15:17–24).

Father Leonid Kudryachov

ERA SOLO UN CRICETO

May 14, 2018

Ma un criceto che ho chiamato Peppino, Signore.

IN DEFENCE OF LOT’S DAUGHTERS

May 9, 2018

Of course, if you know the story, the angels blinded these men and told Lot and his family to get out of town because God was getting ready to destroy the city. God had talked to Abraham about what he was going to do, and Abraham had talked Him down to requiring that there only be ten righteous men in the city of Sodom for the city to be spared. But He didn’t find ten righteous men, He found in fact only one. Even those of Lot’s own household had been corrupted by this time.

So he left, and as I mentioned, his wife looked back even though they were told not to look back on the city, and she was turned into a pillar of salt. Lot made it out of the city with just the clothes on his back, and his two daughters. Both of them had been betrothed by this time, but neither of these men were interested in leaving: They thought that Lot was crazy, so they didn’t go. Later we see that even his daughters were morally corrupted. From his daughters there came two nations, Moab and Ammon, and these two nations were idolaters. They were nothing like the people of Israel, not even some of the time.

Father John Whiteford

I fully agree with the exhortations contained in this father John’s article, but I must take exception about the paragraphes quoted above.

First of all, I do not think that those two Lot’s daughters were married or betrothed: Lot had probably other daughters who were married and lived with their husbands, and stayed with their husbands when they refused to leave with Lot. The Scripture says that those two daughters knew no man and lived in the house of their father. Now, it can be argued that betrothed daughters could still live in the house of their father, waiting for the wedding and to know man, but it’s hardly tenable that betrothed daughters would be considered by their father to be still in his authority to dispose as he wished, offering wives of other men to a mob full of abominable instincts.

Moreover, I think it’s ungenerous to affirm so neatly that those two daughters were morally corrupted. They knew no men and did not look back to the city. All the bad press they have received until now has its origin in the incestuous relationship they cunningly had with their father.

And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our Father. And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.

Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father. And the firstborn bare a son, and called his name Moab: the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day. And the younger, she also bare a son, and called his name Benammi: the same is the father of the children of Ammon unto this day.

Yet, why did they have that incestuous relationship with their father? Out of concupiscence, lust, desire of pleasure? Hardly so! For Lot was an old man, living in a cave in a deserted place, having lost nearly everything he had, and the relationship was consumed with an unconscious man.

No, the Scripture tells us why did they do it. The daughters of Lot, who followed their father and stayed with him in the wilderness, giving thus up any hope to have husbands and a comfortable family life, did it that they might preserve seed of their father, the seed of a righteous man. In all truth, their deeds look more like sacrificial service than moral corruption to me, even if there certainly is a pleasure for every woman (worth her name) in bearing a child; for sure, that’s not a pleasure for corruption, but to salvation (1 Tim 2, 15).

Father John points out that from this relationship came out two idolater nations: Moab and Ammon; and it’s true. They were idolaters. Yet, the Edomites were idolaters too, and they were seed of Abraham.

Father John says that those nations were nothing like the people of Israel, not even some of the time; and it’s true. Yet, the sons of Moab and Ammon did not crucify the Lord of Glory, the sons of Israel did.

Apart from all that, can anyone bear witness that not a single righteous man came out of Ammon? I cannot, but I can bear witness that from Ammon came the mother of Solomon’s heir to the kingdom of Israel.

Can anyone bear witness that not a single righteous man came out of Moab? I cannot, but I can bear witness that from Moab came the mother of Obed, the father of Jesse, the father of king David; out of Moab God chose a woman to conceive and nurture the ancestors of our Lord: Ruth, whose righteousness was so great to deserve an entire book of the Scripture entitled to her name.

In my poor understanding, I think all that is more than enough for us to, at the very least, stop judging the daughters of Lot. They are part of the work of God unto our salvation, and that’s wonderful in our eyes.

A WOLF IN SAKER FEATHERS

May 7, 2018

Many would think that the Saker is just an impenitent spiritual idiot, with a congenital idiosincracy in his perennial failure to understand the difference between the Church and the (many) unworthy men who (often) may rise to the top of her hierarchies.

He is specialized in loquacious plausible yada-yada, always hinting to his vast knowledge of Christianity and perpetually failing to show it off (apart from inconsequential and random quotes, taken from the Scripture or the holy fathers out of their context), whose magniloquent vacuity may be able to deceive babes in Christ, but are exposed by just a modicum of spiritual discernment for what they are: the empty lies of the ancient malice, who is a liar even when saying something true.

In my poor understanding, I would rather characterize him as the core of one of the most sophisticated operation of counterintelligence ever conceived.

It’s hardly believable that someone could be so stupid for so long.

It’s even more unbelievable that someone could really be deceived by his subtle and shameful suggestion of a substantial parification between the Moscow Patriarchate and the organization headed by Denisenko. Alas, in Christ we know how eager are men to be deceived if the delusion fits their lusts.

In any case, the Saker is an impenitent schismatic, hell-bent on sowing confusion, division and strife in the Church, using men weakness as a pretext and masquerading his theomachy under a fake thirst for righteousness. His path leads to the abyss. He means anathema to every Christian.

 

LA SALUTE AL TEMPO DELLA DEMONOCRAZIA SANITARIA

May 4, 2018

Cosi’ e’ se ci pare

Proprio cosi’ e’ se ci pare

Mutatis Mutandis