Hollywood films are much more realistic, don’t you think?

You can watch the video here. And here.


Ballistics experts consulted today describe videos of the French attack as “staged theatrical events.” Other than the suspicious HD video, experts have already noted that, without coming close to “conspiracy theory” dot-connecting, the weapons eject no shell casings, bullets supposedly hit concrete with no effect whatsoever, even from “point blank” range.

You see, the AK47 round, 7.62×39 is not only very powerful but typically has a steel core for penetrating body armour. When hitting concrete, an AK round throws up large chunks of debris, unseen in this event.

Preliminary analysis of the audio as well demonstrates a frequency indicating the subsonic report of a blank round. In an “urban canyon,” a supersonic round from an assault rifle creates a noticeable high frequency “crack” with a secondary “report” or echo, generally described as “crack-pop.”

It has taken only a few hours for press outlets to question perfectly timed HD video from a seemingly fearless bystander who is witnessing actors firing blanks incapable of operating the ejection system of a weapon, imaginary bullets that leave concrete pristine and blood free.
(read more)

Meanwhile, all the proud warriors of the freedom of speech out there have launched a full-fledged assault to the freedom of speech of the Saker. Currently, the world is so structured: a thin layer of demonic archons at the top, an immense army of whores in the middle and a endless mass of cretins at the bottom, who in the name of rights have renounced all their rights and in the name of reason have delivered all their discernment to a talking box, who in the name of freedom rally behind their jailers to destroy humanity in the name of humanity. Puah!

Only a tiny minority of sons of God stands, perpetually endangered but who never disappear, standing by the truth for the sake of the Truth (even when they do not recognize Him).

I have a simple question for all the Pavlovian puppies who are now giving a french kiss to the freedom of speech, responding to the master’s call: where were you, all of you, when Soral, Dieudonne’ and professor Faurisson needed you? When people across Europe got jailed for their opinions, as they didn’t fit the official demonocratic narrative? When the freedom of speech of Palestinians and Ukrainians and Syrian was and is drowned in their blood by criminals who are indecently marching ahead of you now in support of freedom? Where were you? In the doghouse?

If the “Je suis Charlie” crowd is to be believed, my right to draw a cartoon portraying the Virgin Mary as a street whore and her son Jesus pimping her, is of paramount importance, no matter how offensive other people find it. However, it is not important to be able to:

(i) have a public discussion of the implausibilities of the official story of 9/11
(ii) have intellectually honest discussion of the events of WW2, in particularly the atrocities in which Jews were the victims, i.e. the “Holocaust”.
(iii) even mention the power or organized world Jewry (and I mean, even mention it without bothering to say whether you think it is a good or bad thing, it is simply taboo to mention it.)
(iv) have serious discussion of issues like gender, ethnicity, race outside the imposed straightjacket of “political correctness”.

Why are the above topics of discussion taboo? Apparently, it is because such speech offends people. It is hurtful to them!!!???

This is a bizarre paradox and it baffled me for the longest while. Finally, I did resolve the conundrum. Apparently, in France, and in the West generally, unrestricted free speech is only important in the case of people, who, like the ageing hipster cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo, actually have nothing to say!                (read more)          (versione italiana)

St. Paul says that the salary of sin is death!
That being the case, it’s clear that the salary is paid by the employer.
After all, these “Muslim terrorists” identified by identity cards that they lose or by passports found intact between rubble of molten steel would not pass the test of a drunken chimp. Yet, they pass the test of a multitude of people.

Anyway, I absolutely agree that a strong position in favor of the freedom of expression must be taken. I’m going to demonstrate for the freedom of expression of the millions of children who get murdered every year before birth.

I am NOT Charlie, after all!

Charlie Hebdo was not in reality a model of freedom of speech.  It has ended up, like so much of the “human rights left”, defending U.S.-led wars against “dictators”.

In 2002, Philippe Val, who was editor in chief at the time, denounced Noam Chomsky for anti-Americanism and excessive criticism of Israel and of mainstream media. In 2008, another of Charlie Hebdo’s famous cartoonists, Siné, wrote a short note citing a news item that President Sarkozy’s son Jean was going to convert to Judaism to marry the heiress of a prosperous appliance chain. Siné added the comment, “He’ll go far, this lad.” For that, Siné was fired by Philippe Val on grounds of “anti-Semitism”.  Siné promptly founded a rival paper which stole a number of Charlie Hebdo readers, revolted by CH’s double standards.

In short, Charlie Hebdo was an extreme example of what is wrong with the “politically correct” line of the current French left.The irony is that the murderous attack by the apparently Islamist killers has suddenly sanctified this fading expression of extended adolescent revolt, which was losing its popular appeal, into the eternal banner of a Free Press and Liberty of Expression.

Charlie Hebdo had nothing to do with freedom of speech and fearless reporting. Charlie was just a useful stooge of the Demonocratic Empire. It never dared to mock or challenge the real power and oppression, it never produced a single cartoon against the official narrative and the secular religion which harasses and jails people throughout Europe for their opinion, destroying their life and careers, which topples legitimate governments and destroys entire nations and their people around the world. Charlie just enjoyed to routinely defecate on the most sacred belief of nearly 3 billions of persons. Muslims were not the main target, contrary to what most think; at least quantitatively, Christians were.

It’s clear, therefore, that the Demonocratic Empire is working hard now to sanctify them, in order to distract people into new artificial divisions and further advance its dark and filthy agenda.

Freedom of speech has nothing to do with the abuse to selectively insult people in the deepest part of their souls. Setting aside the question about who really did the massacre, I regret the loss of their souls, because a single soul is more precious than the whole universe and their souls are undoubtedly lost, but no, I am NOT Charlie.

I was burnt in Odessa!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: